Sean "Diddy” Comb’s sensational trial has reached a verdict, but the prosecution and defence are still battling each other over sentencing and acquittal pleas.
The defence has made multiple attempts to get the Bad Boy Records founder out on bail, and has even argued that the Mann Act does not apply in the case.
It is what will determine the time he serves in jail for the lesser charge of two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution, which Diddy's attorneys argue is a violation of his First Amendment rights.
The I’ll Be Missing You singer’s legal team further alleges that the case had nothing to support a Mann Act conviction since they had proven that the 55-year-old had no financial motive, and was simply engaging in a swinger’s lifestyle.
In opposition of this, the prosecution has noted that "The defendant masterminded every aspect of Freak Offs," in its filing in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
"He transported escorts across state lines to engage in Freak Offs for pay. He directed the sexual activity of escorts and victims throughout Freak Offs for his own sexual gratification. And he personally engaged in sexual activity during Freak Offs," they wrote, referring to Diddy.
Notably, “Freak-Offs” are infamous parties which allegedly involved heavy drug usage and sexual encounters with multiple people.
Diddy was indicted in the Southern District of New York on charges of racketeering, sex trafficking by force and transportation for purposes of prostitution.