Prince Harry may have lost his latest legal bid to restore full police protection while visiting the UK, but he's far from the only royal left off the security payroll.
As the Duke of Sussex, 40, continues to express concern for his family's safety on UK soil, here's a look at who else in the royal family doesn't receive round-the-clock protection, including some surprising names.
While King Charles, Queen Camilla, and William and Kate are entitled to full-time police security as senior working royals, others have long been cut from the protection list.
Royals without full-time security include:
Prince Andrew: He lost his taxpayer-funded protection in 2019 after stepping back from royal duties.
Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie: They haven't had security since 2011, when Queen Elizabeth slashed their £500k annual protection amid expenses backlash.
Zara and Mike Tindall: As non-working royals, they fund their own security.
Princess Anne, Prince Edward, and Duchess Sophie: They receive police protection only during official engagements.
Peter Phillips: The King's eldest nephew also flies under the radar with no state-funded security.
That being said, Harry's argument is that his unique profile, past military service, and high-profile exit from royal life put him, and his wife Meghan Markle and their kids, at a higher level of risk.
In early 2020, shortly after Harry and Meghan stepped back from their roles as senior royals, the UK’s Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) downgraded his publicly funded police protection.
Harry filed a legal challenge against the Home Office, arguing that the decision puts his family at risk.
Last year, a High Court judge ruled that the decision was lawful, leading Harry to appeal. The Home Office continues to oppose his claim, stating that decisions are made on a case-by-case basis and fall under the authority of the Home Secretary.
RELATED: Prince Harry in financial crisis with eye-watering £1.5mn legal bill after court defeat