As debate reignites over Meghan Markle’s use of her royal title, many are asking: Can the royal family actually strip Prince Harry and Meghan of their Duke and Duchess of Sussex titles?
The short answer: not without Parliament.
This week, a new controversy emerged when Meghan sent a gift to her friend Jamie Kern Lima featuring a note that read: "With compliments of HRH the Duchess of Sussex."
Although the couple retain their HRH titles by birthright (Harry) and marriage (Meghan), they have agreed not to use them in any official or commercial capacity.
The titles are essentially held “in abeyance”, a status shared by Prince Andrew, who no longer uses his HRH styling following controversy.
According to experts, such a move is highly unlikely, and would require an act of Parliament, not just a decision by King Charles or the royal family.
Royal commentator Ingrid Seward, Editor in Chief of Majesty Magazine, told The Royal Beat: “I don’t think anything will happen to the titles. If they lose them, Harry is still a prince of the blood, and Meghan would then be styled as Princess Henry. That would really confuse Americans.”
She added: “The Queen gave them the titles, let them keep them. They’re going to be ‘H and M’ anyway. I think the best thing is to leave them, ignore them, and let them get on with it, which is exactly what the Palace is doing.”
The late Queen had issued a statement at the time supporting the Sussexes’ desire for a more independent life but emphasized that stepping away from royal duties would mean giving up certain privileges, including using "HRH" publicly.
Along with dropping the titles, the Sussexes agreed to renounce public funding, withdraw from the Royal Rota media system, and relinquish Harry’s military appointments.
Meghan’s casual use of the "HRH" moniker on a public gift is raising fresh questions about whether the Sussexes are blurring the lines between royal life and private ventures.
RELATED: Meghan Markle, Prince Harry's HRH titles in jeopardy as William 'won't stand for it'